That makes sense. I use in my one little xml demo.  I asked because it tends
to throw IE6 into quirks mode which I find adds unnecessarily to coding
woes.

drew 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Caudill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Check layer for me please


Drew,

  Truth be told, DW:MX sticks it in there automatically when you tell it to
make xhtml compliant documents.  It's not really doing *anything* useful at
the moment.  But I believe were I writing my own dtd's and creating custom
tags in xml, that would be necessary to start the xml parsing service (wow,
that's a big assumption on my part, but that's the impression I get).

-Stephen
http://www.mechavox.com

Trusz, Andrew<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tuesday, July 15, 2003 7:17
AM, said:

> Stephen, why the xml prolog?

____ * The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM * ____
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
       Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
    http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub

________________  http://www.wdvl.com  _______________________

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

____ � The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM � ____
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
       Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
    http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub

________________  http://www.wdvl.com  _______________________

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to