Hi Fred
>TO say it simply:
>What HTML is to PERL
>Is what CFML is to ASP.
>
>Each activity tends to require micro-coding and multiple pages in ASP as
>compared to CFML. CF is easier to learn and maintain
This is a worry. I have played with that microsoft .hqx and .idc file DB
system. and found that it only did a tiny bit of what CF would do.
I totally agree with your observations on CF and I also find it very quick
and easy. I am doing a project at the moment that started as a pure MS
Access program. All the DB structure, queries, reports and forms where done
by another guy. This was very easy to turn into CF as all the relational DB
and SQL stuff was done for me.
>One horror story involving Cold Fusion
>concerned memory leaks, and lockups high traffic.
>I contact Allaire personally and was assured from multiple sources,
A server of mine was one such victim of this. Version 3.1 has a problem
with releasing processes when under heavy load. They now have 3.1.1 out to
fix that. It wasn't present in other versions. We still have to reboot that
server every day to minimise the problem. It is a very heavily used server.
I have V3.1 on my development NT server next to me, but as I'm the only
user, it hasn't had that problem.
>Here are a couple of references:
>
>http://www.innergy.com/ix/arc/5487.html
>http://www.activeserverpages.com/overview/
thanks for the references
Bruce
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
