At 8:32 AM -0400 7/4/98, P.A. Gantt wrote:
>Dear Listers,
>
>Sorry about that... I meant rubrics (not the cube or the
>font coloration) but this meaning:
>
>"An authoritative rule or direction"
In your list of links, you have a combo of types of assessment. I've found
in most communications, you first need to establish your primary objectives
- then measure from that.
For example, if I have a client who wants the most cool web site that
features Macromedia ShockWave plugins cause they know that their client
base can access this information -- I would build a different site than I
would for a government agency whose primary goal is universal access.
If you explore the links that I posted before --
http://www.dotparagon.com/resources/
you will find links on design -- usability (including the Alertbox site) --
evaulation and so forth.
>You may want to explore the assess links further...
>thus far there appears to be no standardization of
>rubrics for web design or course development and
>assessing purposes.
Actually, the "standardization" is to build to HTML specifications from W3C
-- either HTML 3.2 or HTML 4.0. This does not mean everyone builds
"stardard" sites -- they don't. Many folks don't even know what we are
talking about.
But there /are/ standards.
Kathy
===============================
Kathy E. Gill, Guide - http://agriculture.miningco.com/
WWW design � writing � training - http://www.dotparagon.com/
Mac Advocacy - http://www.halcyon.com/kegill/mac/
"A different world cannot be built by indifferent people."
____________________________________________________________________
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Join The Web Consultants Association : Register on our web site Now
Web Consultants Web Site : http://just4u.com/webconsultants
If you lose the instructions All subscription/unsubscribing can be done
directly from our website for all our lists.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
