On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 22:10 -0800, Cheeto wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:50 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'm (again) wondering how come this patch wasn't accepted upstream. I
> > was having a "day" with this trying to figure out what was happening
> > with my configuration. I couldn't get "proper" usernames to login into
> > cyrus-imapd.
>
> I was approached about it once, but nothing really happened, plus I dont
> believe the patch is as good as it needs to be to be fully integrated
> into CVS.
Seems like web-cyradm devel is slow? (mail list is sure low volume
though)
> > > if ($freenames!="YES") {
> > > - $username = $username . "." . $domain;
> > > + $username = $username . "@" . $domain;
> This one line change allows you to use FQUN, however it would break
> non-FQUN setups and it also breaks certain functions of web-cyradm.
Yeah I know.. I just used that as a quick way to see what works and what
not.
BTW, what is $freenames supposed to be? I asked in another email thread,
but no one responded yet
> > Can I just inquire why this wasn't accepted upstream? (I was actually
> > thinking of hacking the source to accept this change and send it in as a
> > patch)
>
> Feel free to do it, I plan on eventually upgrading to CVS version and
> patching it for FQUN but I'm not sure when.
Well, I _was_ until I found your patch and I guess my itch has been
scratched. (For Now)
--
Ow Mun Heng
Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM
98% Microsoft(tm) Free!!
Neuromancer 14:54:07 up 2 days, 6:17, 6 users, load average: 2.45, 3.00,
1.65
_______________________________________________
This mailing list is hosted and supported
by bit-heads GmbH | http://www.bit-heads.ch
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm
