You got a point there... 2012/10/23 Richard Vézina <[email protected]>
> 12.04 is not a LTS? > > You should stay with LTS, so you will face less often those kind of issues > that happen randomly on some packages each upgrade since Ubuntu is born :) > > Richard > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Sorry... >> >> meant: >> >> didn't know about that. Just trusted Ubuntu team. >> >> But as Bruce stated before, this is not the first time something goes >> wrong with uwsgi and ubuntu. >> Happened before. >> >> And that's sad, because if I can't use uwsgi, nginx is not an option for >> me. >> >> Another thing is that Apache2+wsgi works fine, update after update. >> >> So, I'm startting to think on keep using Apache2+wsgi, instead of >> Nginx+uwsgi, because of that... it's really complicated having issues >> everytime you upgrade something. >> >> But again, still have hope that either Apache2 learns something from >> Nginx, or that Nginx+uwsgi becomes a bit more stable in updates to come (on >> Ubuntu). >> >> Bruce, if you happen to know what happened this time, would you care to >> share ? :) Seems you know a bit about this particular subject. >> >> Thanks for helping! >> >> Cheers, >> Marco Tulio >> >> 2012/10/23 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto <[email protected]> >> >> Didn >>> >>> >>> 2012/10/23 Roberto De Ioris <[email protected]> >>> >>>> >>>> > bump >>>> > >>>> > 2012/10/21 Marco Túlio Cícero de M. Porto <[email protected]> >>>> > >>>> >> Was there any changes on newest release of Ubuntu that would explain >>>> >> uwsgi >>>> >> stop working ? >>>> >> >>>> >> (using latest web2py and nginx+uwsgi script - 2.2.1 Stable) >>>> >> >>>> >> Just wondering... >>>> >> >>>> >> -- >>>> >> []'s >>>> >> Marco Tulio >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> I strongly suggest you to use official uWSGI distribution (until i >>>> manage >>>> to start releasing official PPAs). You can use pip to install it if you >>>> feel more confortable. >>>> >>>> Debian uWSGI packages use a really complex (read:overcomplex) system to >>>> manage startup, while uWSGI has its emperor mode requiring a single line >>>> to startup... >>>> >>>> ...but debian team refused to use it as it is non-debian friendly... >>>> >>>> steps (as root/sudo): >>>> >>>> 1# pip install uwsgi >>>> 2# mkdir /etc/uwsgi >>>> 3# edit /etc/init/uwsgi-emperor >>>> >>>> description "uWSGI Emperor" >>>> >>>> start on runlevel [2345] >>>> stop on runlevel [!2345] >>>> >>>> exec uwsgi --emperor /etc/uwsgi --logto /tmp/uwsgi.log >>>> >>>> 4# start uwsgi-emperor >>>> >>>> ...now just start dropping uWSGI config files in /etc/uwsgi and your >>>> instances will start automatically (check /tmp/uwsgi.log in case of >>>> problems) >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Roberto De Ioris >>>> http://unbit.it >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> []'s >>> Marco Tulio >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> []'s >> Marco Tulio >> >> -- >> >> >> >> > > -- > > > > -- []'s Marco Tulio --
