BUMP! On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Richard <[email protected]>wrote:
> Anything new in trunk about nginx script except Bruno's optimization for > 12.04?? > > I try with the make work nginx under 12.10 with the explanation of Roberto > De Loris without success. > > I install with pip uswgi, I remove the ubuntu uwsgi package... Then I > create a file in /etc/init/uwsgi-emperor with this : > > description "uWSGI Emperor" > > start on runlevel [2345] > stop on runlevel [!2345] > > exec uwsgi --emperor /etc/uwsgi --logto /tmp/uwsgi.log > > But it not working. > > I have use the script already and then uninstall uswgi from ubuntu as I > wrote, but there still uwsgi in /etc/init.d > > When I start uwsgi-emperor I get this error : > > start : Unknown job: uwsgi-emperor > > Any idea? > > Thanks > > Richard > > > Le mardi 23 octobre 2012 16:38:33 UTC-4, Marco Tulio a écrit : >> >> And this is why I love this list... :) >> >> Thanks for you comments Niphlod! >> >> If anyone else has something to add, I'm all ears... >> >> :) >> >> Cheers, >> Marco Tulio >> >> 2012/10/23 Niphlod <[email protected]> >> >> PS: I really don't see the issue. Not every software come as a deb >>> package (web2py, hello!). >>> Roberto is very active on this and on other wsgi-related lists, and >>> helped practically everybody with their setup. >>> >>> What are 4 easy steps to install and forget about uwsgi updates ? >>> >>> Anyway, I switched from ubuntu/debian-based madness >>> (/etc/uwsgi/apps-available? unreadable /etc/init.d/wsgi, etc!! ) to the >>> emperor mode one or two months later it was available for uwsgi (took 6 >>> steps at that time, didn't have Roberto at hand at that moment :P).... >>> I live happily with nginx+uwsgi (just because I need to serve a lot of >>> static files + php pages + web2py applications, else I would have ditched >>> nginx alltogether)....After all, I choose nginx also for configuration >>> semplicity over apache, and uwsgi in emperor mode is really something you >>> shouldn't miss. >>> >>> Scrambling ubuntu versions just to have "the latest one" seems pointless >>> to me: either you need some software that runs only on the newest ubuntu >>> version or you don't upgrade. If things works, why the need to change? >>> BTW: ubuntu 12.10 is not an LTS and it's very early to say that it's a >>> battle-tested version for production: I'm not saying you should expect >>> breakage, but it's not uncommon if you're on the first ones who test it . >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> []'s >> Marco Tulio >> > -- > > > > --
