fully agree with this. However, the html views could perhaps be a bit more html and less python so most html tools could be used to build them and without needing much conversions. As indicated, how the java tapestry framework did this is very nice and we could perhaps borrow some ideas from them.
if youre less drag&drop and more source oriented, the current way is perfect and easy to learn. ------- Original Message ------- From: annet <[email protected]> To: web2py Web Framework <[email protected]> Sent: 29/06/2009, 10:09:26 Subject: [web2py:25222] Re: Web2py is not too designer friendly? I appreciate web2py as it is. In the past I worked with Adobe GoLive, NetBeans, JDeveloper and ADF and Filemaker. Beautiful software, I implemented use case after use case by simply dragging and dropping components and clicking my way through dialog boxes. However, the moment I wanted to adjust the generated code I was overwhelmed by the amount of code the software had generated in different files. Web2py is the first framework that allows me to implement my application the way I designed it, my lack of Python knowledge is the limit, not the framework. I love building my own views in html, css and js keeping structure, style and action separated, something none of these IDE's complied with. I hope web2py will stay as 'clean' as it is, and not become another 'NetBeansese' IDE. Annet. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
