I think I have understood: for a graphic-people point of view, it is normal "opening" a html file with dreamweaver and change it. Graphic-guys here wanted, probably, "open" web2py files inside Dreamweaver, like a normal project of Dreamweaver, to change his graphical aspect, only that.
This is not easy to do with files taken from dynamic websites... then... -------------------- On Jun 29, 3:47 pm, ceej <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I would just like to say that, web2py is a python programming > framework not a designing one and it's a lot easier to use than most. > I can implement the greatest of design that any designer could dream > up with ease. I do not understand when you say "the html views could > perhaps bit more html and less python" because they are pure html/css > when rendered and using the html helpers you can add any ids/classes > you want which is what you need to integrate a design. (You can also > use any other python html template plugin out there with web2py like > genshi etc..). > > I've also seen other threads where people are going on about jquery > and they want more integration/widgets for it etc... This is again > where I would like to say web2py is a python programming framework not > a javascript one. jQuery comes included yes but you can use any > javascript framework with web2py you want (I use extjs as well as > jquery), web2py has jquery included as I would like to call an example > and I think a lot of people get confused about that for some reason. > > I feel if we stray to much from web2py being a "python programming > framework" we'll loose sight of what web2py was meant to be in the > first place which is an an "enterprise framework for agile development > of fast, secure and portable database-driven web-based applications. > Written and programmable in Python". > > P.S. Thank you again Massimo for starting such a great python > framework! :D > > On Jun 29, 6:18 am, "Hans Donner" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > fully agree with this. > > However, the html views could perhaps be a bit more html and less python so > > most html tools could be used to build them and without needing much > > conversions. As indicated, how the java tapestry framework did this is very > > nice and we could perhaps borrow some ideas from them. > > > if youre less drag&drop and more source oriented, the current way is > > perfect and easy to learn. > > > ------- Original Message ------- > > From: annet <[email protected]> > > To: web2py Web Framework <[email protected]> > > Sent: 29/06/2009, 10:09:26 > > Subject: [web2py:25222] Re: Web2py is not too designer friendly? > > > I appreciate web2py as it is. In the past I worked with Adobe GoLive, > > NetBeans, JDeveloper and ADF and Filemaker. Beautiful software, I > > implemented use case after use case by simply dragging and dropping > > components and clicking my way through dialog boxes. However, the > > moment I wanted to adjust the generated code I was overwhelmed by the > > amount of code the software had generated in different files. > > > Web2py is the first framework that allows me to implement my > > application the way I designed it, my lack of Python knowledge is the > > limit, not the framework. I love building my own views in html, css > > and js keeping structure, style and action separated, something none > > of these IDE's complied with. > > > I hope web2py will stay as 'clean' as it is, and not become another > > 'NetBeansese' IDE. > > > Annet. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py Web Framework" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
