I don't think that is a bug but I could be wrong. I wouldn't mind a lighter font but I still think A is the best of the 2. The font in Massimo's "compromise" is a better than the look of the original B font which is just too plain, IMO.
Overall, I don't like the "compromise" version. Too big, too busy... too unbalanced. Logo's should be simple and easily recognizable. I also think A does reference the Python Logo a bit, at least in terms of style. Using a similar font to the Python logo would make it do that even more so. On Aug 14, 10:43 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > > What about this compromise (assuming the two authors agree)? > > It's pretty busy, and misses the elegant simplicity of A. (Do you > really need the URL in the logo? The TM?) > > If you really need to put the A logo in a square space, try just > moving 'web2py' below the W bug and shrinking it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
