or put another way - this can still be updated: since there was a majority of preference for the font of the "squared" configuration, would you ask the author of the wonderful icon to match? or (as I did) have the author of the latter do an overlay of the horizontal logo with the same font used in the squared version?
Thanks, Yarko On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > my point is still: why did you not request consitency in the fonts of the > two configurations? > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:45 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> I did not choose. I just posted some options for people here to >> choose. >> >> Massimo >> >> On Aug 14, 1:41 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:34 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Yes those are definitively 3 people forming a W and that is what makes >> > > it great.I do not think t looks like a bug at all. >> > >> > I agree - the more I see this over the months, the more appealing it >> is... >> > >> > One quetion, though - if you opted for 2 configurations of the logo (and >> it >> > makes sense to have >> > a horizontal and a "squared" version) --- why did you not keep them >> > consistent? e.g. same font? >> > >> > I think this is important for consistency. >> > >> > >> > >> > > On Aug 14, 1:12 pm, __future__ <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > That is what I thought you were referring to. Do you think it looks >> > > > like a bug? I thought it looked like 3 people. I guess it could >> be >> > > > bug... I think our Rorschach results would be quite different :) >> > >> > > > On Aug 14, 11:33 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:15 AM, __future__ wrote: >> > >> > > > > > I don't think that is a bug but I could be wrong. >> > >> > > > > By 'bug' I mean (in this example) the stylized W, minus the >> 'web2py' >> > > > > text. >> > >> > > > > > I wouldn't mind a lighter font but I still think A is the best >> of the >> > > > > > 2. The font in Massimo's "compromise" is a better than the look >> of >> > > the >> > > > > > original B font which is just too plain, IMO. >> > >> > > > > > Overall, I don't like the "compromise" version. Too big, too >> busy... >> > > > > > too unbalanced. >> > >> > > > > > Logo's should be simple and easily recognizable. >> > >> > > > > > I also think A does reference the Python Logo a bit, at least in >> > > terms >> > > > > > of style. Using a similar font to the Python logo would make it >> do >> > > > > > that even more so. >> > >> > > > > > On Aug 14, 10:43 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > >> On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >> > >> > > > > >>> What about this compromise (assuming the two authors agree)? >> > >> > > > > >> It's pretty busy, and misses the elegant simplicity of A. (Do >> you >> > > > > >> really need the URL in the logo? The TM?) >> > >> > > > > >> If you really need to put the A logo in a square space, try >> just >> > > > > >> moving 'web2py' below the W bug and shrinking it. >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
