That is what I thought you were referring to. Do you think it looks like a bug? I thought it looked like 3 people. I guess it could be bug... I think our Rorschach results would be quite different :)
On Aug 14, 11:33 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:15 AM, __future__ wrote: > > > > > I don't think that is a bug but I could be wrong. > > By 'bug' I mean (in this example) the stylized W, minus the 'web2py' > text. > > > > > I wouldn't mind a lighter font but I still think A is the best of the > > 2. The font in Massimo's "compromise" is a better than the look of the > > original B font which is just too plain, IMO. > > > Overall, I don't like the "compromise" version. Too big, too busy... > > too unbalanced. > > > Logo's should be simple and easily recognizable. > > > I also think A does reference the Python Logo a bit, at least in terms > > of style. Using a similar font to the Python logo would make it do > > that even more so. > > > On Aug 14, 10:43 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: > > >>> What about this compromise (assuming the two authors agree)? > > >> It's pretty busy, and misses the elegant simplicity of A. (Do you > >> really need the URL in the logo? The TM?) > > >> If you really need to put the A logo in a square space, try just > >> moving 'web2py' below the W bug and shrinking it. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
