not to tell you what to do with your Logo, Massimo - just my request to consider...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: > or put another way - this can still be updated: > > since there was a majority of preference for the font of the "squared" > configuration, > would you ask the author of the wonderful icon to match? or (as I did) > have the author > of the latter do an overlay of the horizontal logo with the same font used > in the squared version? > > Thanks, > Yarko > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]>wrote: > >> my point is still: why did you not request consitency in the fonts of the >> two configurations? >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:45 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> I did not choose. I just posted some options for people here to >>> choose. >>> >>> Massimo >>> >>> On Aug 14, 1:41 pm, Yarko Tymciurak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:34 PM, mdipierro <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Yes those are definitively 3 people forming a W and that is what >>> makes >>> > > it great.I do not think t looks like a bug at all. >>> > >>> > I agree - the more I see this over the months, the more appealing it >>> is... >>> > >>> > One quetion, though - if you opted for 2 configurations of the logo >>> (and it >>> > makes sense to have >>> > a horizontal and a "squared" version) --- why did you not keep them >>> > consistent? e.g. same font? >>> > >>> > I think this is important for consistency. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On Aug 14, 1:12 pm, __future__ <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > That is what I thought you were referring to. Do you think it >>> looks >>> > > > like a bug? I thought it looked like 3 people. I guess it could >>> be >>> > > > bug... I think our Rorschach results would be quite different :) >>> > >>> > > > On Aug 14, 11:33 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:15 AM, __future__ wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > > I don't think that is a bug but I could be wrong. >>> > >>> > > > > By 'bug' I mean (in this example) the stylized W, minus the >>> 'web2py' >>> > > > > text. >>> > >>> > > > > > I wouldn't mind a lighter font but I still think A is the best >>> of the >>> > > > > > 2. The font in Massimo's "compromise" is a better than the look >>> of >>> > > the >>> > > > > > original B font which is just too plain, IMO. >>> > >>> > > > > > Overall, I don't like the "compromise" version. Too big, too >>> busy... >>> > > > > > too unbalanced. >>> > >>> > > > > > Logo's should be simple and easily recognizable. >>> > >>> > > > > > I also think A does reference the Python Logo a bit, at least >>> in >>> > > terms >>> > > > > > of style. Using a similar font to the Python logo would make it >>> do >>> > > > > > that even more so. >>> > >>> > > > > > On Aug 14, 10:43 am, Jonathan Lundell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >> On Aug 14, 2009, at 5:40 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote: >>> > >>> > > > > >>> What about this compromise (assuming the two authors agree)? >>> > >>> > > > > >> It's pretty busy, and misses the elegant simplicity of A. (Do >>> you >>> > > > > >> really need the URL in the logo? The TM?) >>> > >>> > > > > >> If you really need to put the A logo in a square space, try >>> just >>> > > > > >> moving 'web2py' below the W bug and shrinking it. >>> >>> >>> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/web2py?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
