On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Alex Milowski wrote: > For MathML we have a master bug 3251 that we've been making depend > on every new patch for MathML. That is a very nice in that as new patches > are added and committed, you can get notifications of the changes > in status.
If all you're concerned about is getting email notifications, we can add you to the default CC list for the MathML component. > We also have the MathML component that all bugs should be associated > with. As time goes but, bugs should get filed against the MathML > component but they won't be associated with the master bug for MathML. > > What is the preferred process here? > > Should we keep the master bug? > > Should we use it only for our implementation efforts and not > make it depend on every random bug filed for the MathML > component? I think an important question to ask is, "When will you move the master bug to Resolved/Fixed?" This is basically another way of saying, "What task(s) does the master bug represent?" Once you know that answer, the answers to your other questions may be obvious. -Adam _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list email@example.com http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev