Le 12 juil. 2010 à 21:01, Beth Dakin a écrit : > > On Jul 10, 2010, at 1:17 AM, Alex Milowski wrote: > >> I would think we'd close it when we've actually completely implemented >> MathML. > > If this is what you want the bug to represent, then it does make sense to > keep all feature-implementation bugs related to this master bug, but none of > the bug bugs…if that makes any sense.The bug bugs should be in the MathML > component, but they shouldn't block the feature-complete bug. > >> Just >> enabling it seems like something we could do now but our implementation is >> quite impoverished with respect to MathML 3.0. > > I think we should consider enabling MathML. Just because we don't have MathML > 3.0 implemented yet doesn't mean we need to keep it off; there was a time > when we didn't have any CSS 3 implemented, but that didn't mean our CSS > implementation had to be turned off! I have been playing around with a > MathML-enabled build, and I feel like we do a pretty good job getting a lot > of MathML on the web right, and I haven't experienced any crashes in the > MathML code either. And if we turn it on, more people will test it, and that > is just plain helpful. Just my opinion! >
Opinion that I share! But I think that Alex was not meaning to wait until a full support of MathML 3. François Sausset _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
