On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Beth Dakin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2010, at 1:17 AM, Alex Milowski wrote: > >> I would think we'd close it when we've actually completely implemented >> MathML. > > If this is what you want the bug to represent, then it does make sense to > keep all feature-implementation bugs related to this master bug, but none of > the bug bugs…if that makes any sense.The bug bugs should be in the MathML > component, but they shouldn't block the feature-complete bug. > >> Just >> enabling it seems like something we could do now but our implementation is >> quite impoverished with respect to MathML 3.0. > > I think we should consider enabling MathML. Just because we don't have MathML > 3.0 implemented yet doesn't mean we need to keep it off; ...
Actually, I want it on as soon as possible! :) Having builds available with MathML would get a lot of interest from the MathML power users out there and get feedback on what is and is not working. ...maybe I should just submit the patch that turns it on and let you all decide! :) -- --Alex Milowski "The excellence of grammar as a guide is proportional to the paucity of the inflexions, i.e. to the degree of analysis effected by the language considered." Bertrand Russell in a footnote of Principles of Mathematics _______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
