> On Oct 9, 2019, at 5:43 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez <clo...@igalia.com> > wrote: > > On 03/10/2019 00:43, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >> I don't know the rules regarding the logo use but it might be a bit >> misleading to use WebKit logo without any qualification for GTK+ port on >> wpt.fyi. >> >> I'd imagine people who visiting wpt.fyi may not realize how different GTK+ >> and Apple's WebKit ports are in terms of set of features being enabled, and >> which sets of tests pass in each port. >> >> So at minimum, we may want to add some kind of indication that it's GTK+ >> port; or that it's distinct from Apple's WebKit ports if you were to use >> WebKit's logo somehow. > > I agree that its important to not confuse users and make clearer that > the results are for the WebKitGTK port. > > On one hand the name would be WebKitGTK and the platform Linux, and on > the other hand it would have on the smaller icon at the left a Tux (the > classic Linux penguin). > > See this example of how it would look (without logo still): > > https://wpt.fyi/results/?run_id=334360001&run_id=336100010&run_id=322590004&run_id=332480002&run_id=332480003 > > > However, I agree that still can be confusing if we use the WebKit logo > as is. So, let's discard doing that. > > But, I wonder if it would be OK to use a variation of the WebKit logo > with some clearly visible modifications like different colors. > > For example: https://cloud.igalia.com/index.php/s/y4xrKBYBY8t643D > (Its the WebKit logo but with the GTK colors) > > > Would be using this variation of the logo OK?