On Apr 17, 8:21 am, Stephen Compall <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Leslie P. Polzer" <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Maybe we should use this opportunity and make sure that actions are
> > one-shot (i.e. only the first invocation of an action via a certain
> > action code has an effect)?
>
> I suppose, but I don't think this patch helps with that.

No, it's just a related topic...


> It's a slightly harder problem, because of impatience.  Including the
> double-clickers.

Yeah, we could only provide a software fallback to cope with
people missing patience. :)


> Anyway you shouldn't call render-link and render-form outside of widget
> rendering.  Calling `make-action' does not do the association, but an
> action may only associate with one widget.  I think that rendering
> actions without one of the `render-*' functions or their macro wrappers
> should yield undefined behavior.

I'm not a friend of UB in Weblocks. We should strive to either throw
an error,
throw a warning or do the right thing.


> I hijacked `log-ui-action', a debugging function that is always called
> anyway, for this.

For what exactly? I can't associate the 'this' at the end...


> > I reviewed the patch; it looks good although the terminology is
> > a bit florid. From what planet did you snatch it?
>
> Trill.  Essentially "symbiosis": the action cannot live without its
> widget.

Now I could've thought of that...


> Me too, and I also hate "friendly" URLs.  They encourage needless
> minimalism in user interface design,

What's the relation between friendly URLs and UI minimalism?
I'm curious.


> I would rather add a little complexity to make it more acceptable and
> have it on by default.

+1.

  Leslie
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weblocks" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to