On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:04:39AM -0400, Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Leslie P. Polzer > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, and I still don't see the point -- action URLs should be fresh > > even when the back button is used. > It's just a question of user experience. People expect their back > button to work reasonably well (although, fortunately, they don't > expect perfect behavior). If every time they click "back" and then > click on an action they get "action no longer valid" notice, it would > be suicide in terms of the UI design.
You're missing my point. One of our basic axioms is that dynamic pages should come fresh from the server and must not be cached on the client. And another limitation that we have regardless of whether we have an action GC or not is that multiple views into the same widget tree (mostly isomorphous with URL) are not working that well. So I still don't get how the action GC changes anything here. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
