On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Leslie P. Polzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, and I still don't see the point -- action URLs should be fresh > even when the back button is used. It's just a question of user experience. People expect their back button to work reasonably well (although, fortunately, they don't expect perfect behavior). If every time they click "back" and then click on an action they get "action no longer valid" notice, it would be suicide in terms of the UI design.
I just see it as a pretty big UI annoyance in exchange for very little benefit. When a session times out, everything can be picked up by the garbage collector anyway, so what is this for? Very long sessions? I just don't see what pain the patch solves. Normally this wouldn't bother me, but I feel like making the back button behavior even worse is a pretty major issue. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weblocks" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/weblocks?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
