On Dec 5, 2008, at 7:38 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
http://fromapitosolution.blogspot.com/2008/12/criticism-of-java-persistence.html
WebObjects gets mentioned twice. Might be an interesting read if
you have spare time.
Chuck
The blog post is clueless, and "criticism" is very shallow and missing
the point. There's no real analysis behind the pretentious title.
To PA's question on getting down to the basics... During the last 1.5
years I got involved on and off in a JDBC project with a thin layer of
home-made "utility classes" (not written by me). I honestly made an
attempt to stay down to the basics. Maybe that's just because of Java,
but adding a new entity with a few relationships would take 3-5 days;
creating a more or less complex query - 2 days; making sure you can
commit a simple 2-3 level tree structure - 2-3 days; visualizing
object changes - impossible; migrating between versions of the same DB
(e.g. PostgreSQL 8.1 to 8.3) - constant pain tracking down subtle bugs
for a couple of months.
(a rant from the Cayenne guy)
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
