Le 2011-09-26 à 03:59, Andrus Adamchik a écrit : > > On Sep 26, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote: > >> Am 26.09.2011 um 07:39 schrieb John Huss: >> >>> Cayenne + Tapestry >> >> We tried it some years ago (it might have evolved) in a larger project >> (customer did not want WO) but it was not ready. And every new release broke >> some APIs... > > Cayenne or Tapestry? Cayenne was "ready" since probably 2004-2005. Tapestry - > since v4 (around 2005-2006). Tapestry 5 which indeed is a full rewrite > incompatible with earlier versions, is rather cool. Among other the IoC > container makes it that. But then the WO community never fully appreciated > IoC...
Andrus, I have to ask a legal question: since people say Cayenne is EOF-like, does Cayenne is clean of EOF patents? In the last two years, Apple is patent crazy, so I do fear that they can go against the project (disclaimer: I never looked at Cayenne, so I don't know). And for REST and D2W, what we could use with Cayenne? _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
