appleseed discussions may use WO as well?

Tim
UCLA GSE&IS

On Mar 5, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote:

> From what I learned, the iTunes group is still using WO, but the other groups 
> can use whatever they want.
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Gino Pacitti" <ginok...@mac.com>
> À: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
> Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Mars 2014 16:45:47
> Objet: Re: WebObjects-Projects?
> 
> So if these guys are poached by Apple - what technology are they using there? 
> Have they left WO completely?
> 
> 
> On 5 Mar 2014, at 21:23, Pascal Robert <prob...@macti.ca> wrote:
> 
>> It's not only Mike who was poached by Apple. Kieran, Miguel Arroz, Mark 
>> Ritchie, Q, Guido, the list is quite long.
>> 
>> 75% of the community wants to keep using WO, but not much people are doing 
>> anything to improve things. It will be my last WOWODC, I'm tired to trying 
>> to improve the conference while having less and less people coming to the 
>> conference? It's time that I can care of my health and have some fun instead 
>> of being full of stress.
>> 
>> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Ramsey Gurley" <rgur...@smarthealth.com>
>> À: "Jürgen Simon" <si...@webtecc.com>
>> Cc: webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com
>> Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Mars 2014 15:12:49
>> Objet: Re: WebObjects-Projects?
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:37 AM, Jürgen Simon <si...@webtecc.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> this is not a technical inquiry, more a temperature check on the business 
>>> side of WebObjects. It is my impression that at least in Germany, after the 
>>> 2008/2009 crisis the market for WebObjects-projects has really been down a 
>>> lot. I have been looking hi and lo for opportunities to work with WO again, 
>>> but apart from self-initiated projects there was nothing going on.
>>> 
>>> Is this perception limited to Germany or is it even just me? Are there any 
>>> project marketplaces for WO that I am not aware of? How much of a future 
>>> would you guys think WO really has?
>>> 
>>> Kind Regards,
>>> Jürgen
>> 
>> 
>> Having worked with WO for a while now, I think it’s safe for me to say WO 
>> has a limited future. 
>> 
>> For one, Apple did not open source it when they left it for dead in 
>> 2008/2009. The “Apple only hardware” license restriction is pretty lame too. 
>> I seems they did this hoping to kill it. It appears they are looking at 
>> other solutions besides WO for their own usage. The last time I saw an 
>> @apple.com address break radio silence, it was on the Cayenne list. It seems 
>> pretty tragic, but that’s what it looks like from the outside.
>> 
>> Two, Anjo left Wonder. Mike was poached by Apple and has been MIA since.  
>> Without Anjo to keep people in line, I’ve noticed the quality of 
>> contributions have declined. Without Mike’s tireless contributions, I’ve 
>> noticed most commits are not in the form of great useful new frameworks, but 
>> refactoring of old frameworks. Refactoring combined with loose quality 
>> control has made Wonder something that went from “I can’t wait to update my 
>> repo” to “I’m scared if I update my repo, stuff is going to break… again.”
>> 
>> Third, the type of applications WO excels at are no longer in demand. If you 
>> make an app that requires someone to poke in 42 text fields on their 
>> smartphone, you are doing it wrong. But that’s exactly the sort of app that 
>> WO is purpose built to handle. Dynamic URLs are universally hated by the 
>> marketing department. "Why can’t we just have domain.com/page?? WO URLs are 
>> horrible for SEO!!”  WO can give you a table of data sorted and nested 
>> inside another table of data which is also sorted and nested as deep as you 
>> want to go. Automatically. And it will keep track of all that, but then... 
>> who’s going to read a table that big on a 5” screen? The design department 
>> wants minimal info on the page, please. Just the facts ma’am. Those sort of 
>> desktop apps have already been built. They’re now in maintenance mode. No 
>> one is going to rewrite them in WO any sooner that someone is going to 
>> rewrite all the WO apps in something else.
>> 
>> Fourth, the tooling is showing bit rot. Q is the only person left who really 
>> has a handle on how WOLips works. My copy of rule modeler is buggy as hell 
>> and crashes 50% of the time I try to launch or save something under 
>> Mavericks. Installing WO for dev or deployment requires a PhD in WebObjects. 
>> Monitor slowly becomes less and less responsive until you’re forced to 
>> reboot it. Even when it works, it doesn’t really monitor everything I need 
>> to know. Memory, cpu, disk space? Oh, go get Nagios and add to your 
>> administration nightmare.
>> 
>> Finally, there’s the learning cliff involved with WO. WO developers are as 
>> rare as unicorns. Learning WO in depth takes months/years to do, even for an 
>> experienced Java developer. In a lot of cases, the WO app that is out there 
>> isn’t in prime condition and requires lots of maintenance. It was probably 
>> built on an existing legacy database with a schema that goes against the WO 
>> way. That results a sub-optimal development experience with WO. Especially 
>> for the uninitiated. Nobody is going to learn it on the job and think “Wow, 
>> this is so great! I love WebObjects!!"
>> 
>> This is not to say WO is bad. WO is great for what it does. If you have a 
>> mac, you know WO already, you don’t mind the tools are a little creaky, you 
>> have your own wonder fork, you are okay with writing whatever frameworks you 
>> need, you are the dba, and it works for you.. knock yourself out. I don’t 
>> expect to see a lot of new faces around though.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
>> 
>> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/ginokris%40me.com
>> 
>> This email sent to ginok...@me.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/probert%40macti.ca
> 
> This email sent to prob...@macti.ca
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists%40thetimmy.com
> 
> This email sent to li...@thetimmy.com


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to