"Pierce T. Wetter III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> hat geschrieben:
> I've actually done the above. It was kind of a mini-WO. You could
> have a <TWINFORCES> tag in your HTML, and our server would parse the
> HTML and generate pages on the fly. We even did database access.
> Sure, it cost about $25K.
>
> But it didn't work 100%. Read the EOF chapter on "Uniquing". We
> didn't do that.
Read in the Web about GNUstep database library and how it supports
uniquing. It does everything EOF 1.1 did once ...
> Nor did we have an easy way to handle session
> identification, timeouts, or form processing. Or caching.
Everything of this is now big deal.
> Plus there weren't any web page design tools that could handle a
> <TWINFORCES> tag.
Why didn't you use WEBOBJECT style tags ?!
> And so on.
What ?
> Until you've tried to do it the hard way, you don't realize how
cool WO is.
WO is really cool and this is mainly because of it's well thought out
design and its simplicity.
Reimplementing the WO library itself is not that 'hard' if you did
some web development before.
==
Tschaui
Helge
--
MDlink online service center
http://www.mdlink.de
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
