* Alan Burlison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-01 17:55]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > >* Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-01 17:19]: > >>a process/authority question: who was in the approval path for today's > >>change to the www.opensolaris.org home page? > > > > As far as I know, core contributors to Tools and Advocacy. > > Copied from ogb-discuss, where the same question was asked: > > >James Carlson wrote: > > > >>The only question I want decided is whether the community is ready > >>_now_ to have an OpenSolaris distribution. We can always adopt one or > >>another distribution as "the reference one" at any point. The issue > >>on the table is that someone updated www.opensolaris.org to say that > >>Indiana's product is _the_ OpenSolaris distribution, and that's just > >>not right. > >> > >>It clearly does not reflect any community-wide decision on the use of > >>the opensolaris.org web site or about the adoption of a reference > >>distribution. > > > >I am a project leader of the Website project and a community leader > >of the parent Tools community - as far as I know neither of these > >groups was consulted, and I certainly wasn't consulted personally > >either.
I trusted the folks on website-content to pursue a discussion the page design. I see Core Contributors from a number of CGs on that list. - Stephen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
