Brandorr wrote: > On 11/1/07, Derek Cicero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sean Sprague wrote: >>> Bill, >>> >>>> a process/authority question: who was in the approval path for today's >>>> change to the www.opensolaris.org home page? >>>> >>> Agreed. I would also like to know. I think that splurging the words >>> "Developer Preview" over "OpenSolaris" is a mistake. is rightly >>> explained as a milestone in the use of OpenSolaris, but by no means the >>> be-all-and-end-all of OpenSolaris; and the crude roadmap is nothing >>> but... crude and non-representational for where OpenSolaris (as opposed >>> to Indiana) is going. >>> >>> Basically IMO, the front page currently sucks. >> Sorry to hear you don't like it. It was the best I could do. >> >> Might I suggest you offer a better representation? GIMP is free after all. > > Derek, I suspect that the criticism is not of your art skills, but > rather of the content or message. IE: "OpenSolaris is now a distro" (I > personally like the art, but I could be wrong).
No. The attack was on the page, not on the content. People who attack others in this community should be asked to leave. They have no place here. Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
