Alan Burlison wrote: > The need for improvements to the current opensolaris.org website is > already accepted. The need for segmenting the community is open to > discussion, and I think that discussion needs to take place first before > deciding the consequences of any such split on the web infrastructure.
Well, I think we needed to start thinking about that topic. I actually haven't thought too much about the content, but wanted to provide a sense of context for segmenting the community (and segmenting seems like a slightly harsh word for what I'm hoping to see in the future). > If the decision is that we need distinct web properties for different > purposes, we can certainly do that. In that case I think we would need > to start with an accurate appraisal of what we currently have and where > it can be found. We can then move on to discuss what needs to be added, > what needs to be removed and what needs to be moved. http://opensolaris.org/os/site-map/ probably gives most of that picture of what we currently have and where it can be found. Good luck trying to find the useful content. There's a lot of content that doesn't fit into the current Project or Community Group bucket. > A list that includes most of the stuff we already have whilst > simultaneously suggesting that it doesn't already exist doesn't seem to > be a particularly good starting point to me. I wasn't suggesting that it didn't exist - much of what I wrote in the blog is available elsewhere, but in a different form, and hidden from view. I think we should figure out where we want to be, rather than look at what we currently have. Glynn _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
