Glynn Foster wrote: > I personally haven't thought too much about what involvement people would > have > with a .com site. I think apart from a few key pages, not much would change - > it > would be relatively static content. It would be a launch pad into allowing > them > to easily download and install a binary artifact, or start to associate > themselves from an advocacy perspective, or then start to introduce them to > the > active contributing part of the community (in which, I'd suspect > opensolaris.org > would still have a strong part).
Now I'm *really* confused: If the .com site contains largely the same content as the current .org site, what are the benefits of setting up a separate .com site? If all the .org content is moving to the .com site, what will be left on the .org site? If the .org content isn't moving, what will be on the .com site? What happens to the nearly 100,000 registered users on the .org site? Who will be responsible for providing the infrastructure for the .com site? Who will be responsible for deciding what content goes on the .com site? -- Alan Burlison -- _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
