Ronald A. DeMena III wrote: > So now that I have allowed this material to digest in my head. > > Regardless the actions that have occurred over the past week or so what I > have come to understand is the involvement of the people for the purpose of > serving as a Website Editorial Board is no longer the intended path. > Additionally, it would seem as if we the former individuals who were asked > to participate in this capacity were "quote" left out of the future > direction regardless the formal organizational structure. I still hold an > interest. I still have a desire to participate. >
Sorry about that, Ron. No disrespect intended. And thanks for speaking up. I said in my mail yesterday that we ought leverage and build from what the committee has already done (based on their work and their expression of interest in participating in an editorial function the previous OGB set up). And I also wanted the committee members to participate but I didn't specifically say as founding members. My mistake. I see Alan has fixed that. We have two things we are building from: Alan's initial proposal and the website committee. Hopefully we'll get something in shape so we can move this forward and get it approved. If I have forgotten anything else, just shout ... :) Jim -- http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/ _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
