On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 12:09 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:31 AM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol > <o...@sophia-louise.de> wrote: > > Am 15.02.2011 03:09, schrieb David Nelson: > >> [...] > >> I specifically want to ask for us.libreoffice.org, ca.libreoffice.org > >> and uk.libreoffice.org. > > > > +1 for the us and uk. > > I still disagree. This is in conflict with the language-codes used. So > still -1 from my side. > > If you want a complete subsite as opposed to a specific section, then > you need to find another scheme. us, uk, ca won't work (IMO).
Yes - Christian you make a very strong and valid point here, it does break the current pattern, the current is language based not country code. > > canada.libreoffice.org united-states.libreoffice.org, > united-kingdom.libreoffice.org if you please, but uk is Ukrainian, ca > it Catalan,…. It still breaks down, to me, along language. A French speaking speaking Canadian or a Portuguese speaking Ghanaian, is likely to find the NL website for the respective language. Alright - I've just deleted long paragraphs about language, marketing and community building twice (the clock say I need to move on) so I'll stop with just this - on this point of language based sub-domains, I am in full agreement the site is too deeply built on that foundation to break it, IMO. Thanks Drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@libreoffice.org List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
