On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:43:30PM +0200, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > Terrel Shumway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The code in CGIWrapper/CGIWrapper.py hasn't been touched in 10 months > > (and then only to fix a minor bug). It seems to be implementing > > MiscUtils.Configurable from before it was factored out into a separate > > class. It may not be broken, but my feeling is that bit rot has > > definitely set in. > > > > Is anyone using it? Does anyone care? > > This is the one that lets you use the standard CGI module through > webware, for increased efficiency -- right? I've been thinking about > using it -- I think it would be a shame if it went away... (Although I > guess fcgi etc. are alternatives.)
I think it's the one that lets you port an existing CGI application to Webware without having to change the CGI scripts. Not for efficiency, but just to avoid rewriting the application. -- -Mike (Iron) Orr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (if mail problems: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://iron.cx/ English * Esperanto * Russkiy * Deutsch * Espan~ol _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
