On Fri, 2002-04-26 at 12:43, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > Terrel Shumway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The code in CGIWrapper/CGIWrapper.py hasn't been touched in 10 months > > (and then only to fix a minor bug). It seems to be implementing > > MiscUtils.Configurable from before it was factored out into a separate > > class. It may not be broken, but my feeling is that bit rot has > > definitely set in. > > > > Is anyone using it? Does anyone care? > > This is the one that lets you use the standard CGI module through > webware, for increased efficiency -- right? I've been thinking about > using it -- I think it would be a shame if it went away... No, what you are thinking of is CGIAdapter, which is used by WebKit.cgi to connect with AppServer. I would guess that *most* people use that, until they figure out mod_webkit. It will definitely not go away.
> (Although I guess fcgi etc. are alternatives.) mod_webkit works well. I am still trying to figure out fcgi. CGIWrapper is actually a precursor to what we know as WebKit. AFAICT it is totally obsolete. (The reason I even asked is because I didn't clearly understand what it was. If I had understood, I would have just sent a private message to Chuck and not bothered the list?) Am I right Chuck? Should it be removed from the distribution to avoid silly questions like mine? _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
