On Friday April 26, 2002 06:24 pm, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote: > Terrel Shumway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip] > > > > This is the one that lets you use the standard CGI module through > > > webware, for increased efficiency -- right? I've been thinking about > > > using it -- I think it would be a shame if it went away... > > > > No, what you are thinking of is CGIAdapter, which is used by WebKit.cgi > > to connect with AppServer. > > Am I? What I'm thinking about is the thing that lets you run > completely ordinary CGI scripts with webware... (Not servlet stuff.)
I don't think such a thing exists. Maybe you're thinking of mod_python, which has a mode which is intended to accelerate CGI scripts. > > [snip] > > > CGIWrapper is actually a precursor to what we know as WebKit. AFAICT it > > is totally obsolete. (The reason I even asked is because I didn't > > clearly understand what it was. If I had understood, I would have just > > sent a private message to Chuck and not bothered the list?) > > > :) > : > > Am I right Chuck? Should it be removed from the distribution to avoid > > silly questions like mine? CGIWrapper serves a different purpose than WebKit. Its goal is to make it easier to write a CGI application. Some people might find it useful if they are writing an app that has to be deployed using CGI for whatever reason. I personally don't see the harm of leaving it in Webware and occasionally getting silly questions :-) - Geoff _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
