Hate to say it, but I disagree: Under HIPAA a pharmacist's job is to establish and comply with certain policies for privacy, security and electronic claims processing. It is a pharmacist's *professional* obligation to avoid (or mitigate) harm to individuals, and HIPAA is not intended to *interfere* with this. But HIPAA says nothing about mitigation of harm or professional standards.   
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Rosenblum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 3:57 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: Here is a good Privacy Issue that will cause problems

Tim,

 

I must respectfully disagree with your fundamental analysis of this scenario.  Pharmacists (chemists) have, for more than 2000 years, been part of a triad (including physicians and nurses) engaged in an on-going clinical (NOT business) practice of ensuring that the correct medications and drugs are received by the correct patients.  Whenever we remove one of those clinical disciplines from the decision-making process, medication errors and mistakes are likely to increase.

 

It is NOT the intention of HIPAA to deter a good clinical practice.  Unfortunately, when unscrupulous people get hold of blank-prescriptions, innocent people may get hurt.  Under HIPAA, our responsibility then becomes mitigation of the harm.

 

I hope that this helps.

 

Your questions are always welcome.

 

Matt

 

Matthew Rosenblum

Chief Operations Officer

Privacy, Quality Management & Regulatory Affairs

http://www.CPIdirections.com

 

CPI Directions, Inc.

10 West 15th Street, Suite 1922

New York, NY 10011

 

(212) 675-6367

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This E-Mail is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you have received this communication in error, please do not distribute it.  Please notify the sender by E-Mail at the address shown and delete the original message. Thank you.

 

AVISO DEL CONFIDENCIALIDAD: Este email es solamente para el uso del individuo o la entidad a la cual se dirige y puede contener información privilegiada, confidencial y exenta de acceso bajo la ley aplicable. Si usted ha recibido esta comunicación por error, por favor no lo distribuya.  Favor notificar al remitente del E-Mail a la dirección mostrada y elimine el mensaje original. Gracias.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:00 PM
To: WEDI SNIP Privacy Workgroup List
Subject: RE: Here is a good Privacy Issue that will cause problems

 

In my personal opinion, this practice - violating patient privacy, in the name of detecting abuse by private businesses - which is (it appears to me) unsupported by statute (unless mandated by DEA regulation) - is contrary to both many state laws and HIPAA.  I agree the practice serves a valuable community need, as well as the needs of the abusing patient (intervention).  However, as it (as I see it) is NOT a law enforcement reporting issue, but rather a "home grown" solution, that business simply do out of common sense, the practice will either have to be suspended, with suspects reported to law enforcement - cutting out the Sherlock Holms detection engaged in by pharmacists in the process - or get a state statute passed to support and require the activity.  After all, it appears to me that what is really occurring here is abuse of privacy, and potentially serious defamation, and that a case might be made for damages if a person is placed on these distribution lists wrongly.  However, as I am not an attorney I can not pass on a formal opinion.  Just keep in mind that a person DOES NOT LOOSE ANY RIGHTS just because a pharmacist suspects abuse!!!  It is up to statutory law enforcement of investigate, and a court to determine if a crime has been committed, NOT A CE, regardless of their practices.  I am frankly amazed that we have not heard more litigation on this issue.

 

Regards,

 

Tim McGuinness, Ph.D.
Consulting Specialist in Regulatory Privacy, Security, and Application Compliance

---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org
---
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time.

You are currently subscribed to wedi-privacy as: archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org

Reply via email to