|
No. This note in the SVC is
pretty clear:
Although the
SVC loop is optional, there are times when it should be considered mandatory. Whenever the actual
payment has been reduced due to service
line specific adjustments, the SVC loop is
necessary in order to understand the remittance information. This situation is particularly applicable to
professional and fee-based
services.
Even if you consider
"should be considered mandatory" to by synonymous with "required" (they are
not), the SVC segment is only needed when adjustments reduce the amount
paid.
--- The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time. You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org |
Title: Message
- COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
- Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
- RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
- RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
- RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
- RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
- RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
- RE: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
- RE: COB Balancing Rachel Foerster
