wedi-transactions  

Messages by Date

• 2003/09/23 NUBC code set changes - patient's relationship to the insured Marcus E. McCrory
• 2003/09/23 FW: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRO NIC Hazelrigs, Jim
• 2003/09/23 Re: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Lisa Cavitt/SIH
• 2003/09/23 Re: 277 RESPONSE TO CLAIMS SUBMITED BEFORE 10/16/2003 David A. Feinberg, C.D.P.
• 2003/09/23 Re: Pt. weight required when date of death reported? Doug Webb
• 2003/09/23 Re: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Phillip Otto
• 2003/09/23 Re: 277 RESPONSE TO CLAIMS SUBMITED BEFORE 10/16/2003 Doug Webb
• 2003/09/23 RE: Pt. weight required when date of death reported? Mary Burkinshaw
• 2003/09/23 Re: Pt. weight required when date of death reported? Doug Webb
• 2003/09/23 277 RESPONSE TO CLAIMS SUBMITED BEFORE 10/16/2003 Alex Kaplun
• 2003/09/23 Pt. weight required when date of death reported? David Wechsler
• 2003/09/23 Re: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Doug Webb
• 2003/09/23 RE: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRO NIC Bob Perlitz
• 2003/09/23 Does the CMS contingency plan affect ASCA? Catherine Lohmeier
• 2003/09/23 Re: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRO NIC Marcus E. McCrory
• 2003/09/23 RE: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Rachel Foerster
• 2003/09/23 RE: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRO NIC Valeta Barger
• 2003/09/23 RE: 997 Could Be Better Stuart Beaton
• 2003/09/23 Re: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Doug Webb
• 2003/09/23 RE: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRO NIC Torning, Kate
• 2003/09/23 Re: 835 Doug Webb
• 2003/09/23 RE: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Michelle Butler-Gorman
• 2003/09/23 FW: 835 Bard, Greg
• 2003/09/23 FW: CMS NEWS: MEDICARE ANNOUNCES HIPAA PLAN Chris Brancato-HDS
• 2003/09/23 MEDICARE ANNOUNCES PLAN TO ACCEPT HIPAA NON-COMPLIANT ELECTRONIC Marcallee Jackson
• 2003/09/23 Re: transaction timing Lisa Cavitt/SIH
• 2003/09/22 RE: 997 Could Be Better John Link
• 2003/09/22 Insurance cards with no Insured ID David Frenkel
• 2003/09/22 Re: 997 Could Be Better Marcus E. McCrory
• 2003/09/22 RE: Referring Physician Issue (837I) Mimi Hart
• 2003/09/22 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/22 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Valeta Barger
• 2003/09/22 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Mike Urban
• 2003/09/22 RE: Rejection of file for date/time match McNeece, Rob
• 2003/09/22 RE: Rejection of file for date/time match Matthew Fuller
• 2003/09/22 Re: 997 Could Be Better David A. Feinberg, C.D.P.
• 2003/09/22 Re: Rejection of file for date/time match Marcus E. McCrory
• 2003/09/22 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Rachel Foerster
• 2003/09/22 RE: Rejection of file for date/time match McNeece, Rob
• 2003/09/22 RE: 997 Could Be Better Graydon Gorby
• 2003/09/22 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Valeta Barger
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Rachel Foerster
• 2003/09/22 Fw: Insurance cards with no Insured ID C. Campbell
• 2003/09/22 RE: 997 Could Be Better Helen Gurevich
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
• 2003/09/22 Fw: Insurance cards with no Insured ID C. Campbell
• 2003/09/22 Re: 997 Could Be Better Kepa Zubeldia
• 2003/09/22 Re: Code Set Question bharris
• 2003/09/22 DRG question Ed Stroot
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
• 2003/09/22 Rejection of file for date/time match Matthew Fuller
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
• 2003/09/22 Re: Refusal to sign consent form Doug Webb
• 2003/09/22 997 Could Be Better ICSSoftware
• 2003/09/22 Code Set Question Dale Brown
• 2003/09/22 Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
• 2003/09/22 RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
• 2003/09/22 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/22 Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
• 2003/09/22 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/22 Re: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
• 2003/09/20 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Rachel Foerster
• 2003/09/20 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Rachel Foerster
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Ken Steen
• 2003/09/19 COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship William Openshaw
• 2003/09/19 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID William Openshaw
• 2003/09/19 Re: 2400 Loop SV5 Durable Medical Equipment Service Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Christopher Feahr
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID William J. Kammerer
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 2400 Loop SV5 Durable Medical Equipment Service Mary Burns
• 2003/09/19 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Mike Urban
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID William J. Kammerer
• 2003/09/19 RE: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Valeta Barger
• 2003/09/19 Re: Insurance cards with no Insured ID Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship Catherine Lohmeier
• 2003/09/19 Re: clearinghouse/provider relationship Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 Re: ICD9 codes Doug Webb
• 2003/09/19 Insurance cards with no Insured ID Susan Hollabaugh
• 2003/09/19 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship Torning, Kate
• 2003/09/18 Re: Announcement: Public Review Period for 004050 Insurance Implementation Guides David A. Feinberg, C.D.P.
• 2003/09/18 RE: ICD9 codes Connie Lagneaux
• 2003/09/18 835 Institutional Clark, Doug P
• 2003/09/18 IG Violates X12 Standard - 095 A1 X12 834 Art Schenkman
• 2003/09/18 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship William Openshaw
• 2003/09/18 Re: MD Settlements May Not Guarantee Transparency of Claims Processing Christopher Feahr
• 2003/09/18 Re: clearinghouse/provider relationship Doug Webb
• 2003/09/18 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship Catherine Lohmeier
• 2003/09/18 Re: Definitions of Various Physician Roles as defined in the 837I and P Doug Webb
• 2003/09/18 Re: Taxonomy Codes Doug Webb
• 2003/09/18 Re: WebMD claims submission and 'submitter reports' Doug Webb
• 2003/09/18 Re: clearinghouse/provider relationship Doug Webb
• 2003/09/18 Re: Questions on 278 Public Comment Period for the 4010 278 Health Care Services Review Notification and Acknowledgment Guide (004010X111) David A. Feinberg, C.D.P.
• 2003/09/18 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship Christopher Feahr
• 2003/09/18 RE: WebMD claims submission and 'submitter reports' Marcallee Jackson
• 2003/09/17 RE: 837 Looping question Tom Drinkard
• 2003/09/17 RE: clearinghouse/provider relationship Christopher Feahr
• 2003/09/17 RE: 837 Looping question Mary Burkinshaw
• 2003/09/17 RE: 837 Looping question Mary Burkinshaw
• 2003/09/17 Re: 837 Looping question Kepa Zubeldia
• 2003/09/17 RE: 837 Looping question Tom Drinkard
• 2003/09/17 RE: 837 Looping question Mary Burkinshaw
• 2003/09/17 RE: 837 Looping question David Slauenwhite
• 2003/09/17 WebMD claims submission and 'submitter reports' Matt Chapuis
• 2003/06/06 HIPAA Metrics Jensen, Martin
• 2003/06/06 RE: 270 transaction Laurance Stuntz
• 2003/06/06 RE: 270 transaction Murphy-Hole, Jan
• 2003/06/06 RE: Payer 835 Response to Provider 837 Scenario Question Tucci-Kaufhold, Ruth A.
• 2003/06/06 Payer 835 Response to Provider 837 Scenario Question Gregus, Gary
• 2003/06/06 Are reversals required in the 835? Linda Young
• 2003/06/06 RE: New ACK segment response... Bill Chessman
• 2003/06/06 New ACK segment response... Young, Brian
• 2003/06/06 RE: [BULK] - RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Bill Chessman
• 2003/06/06 Re: ETIN Doug Webb
• 2003/06/06 Re: ETIN Del Texley
• 2003/06/06 RE: [BULK] - RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Jensen, Martin
• 2003/06/06 Letter from AHA to CMS David Frenkel
• 2003/06/06 Re: ETIN William J. Kammerer
• 2003/06/05 RE: 270 transaction Kaye Laymance
• 2003/06/05 Re: AHA! An Implementation Plan, or New, Improved Train Wreck? Doug Webb
• 2003/06/05 RE: [BULK] - RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/05 RE: Letter from AHA to CMS: or the HIPAA EDI Train Wreck Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider David Frenkel
• 2003/06/05 RE: [BULK] - RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Kevin Day
• 2003/06/05 Re: XML vs. EDI (now: DDE and CH legality issues) Christopher Feahr
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/05 RE: Transition paper Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/05 RE: 270 transaction David Frenkel
• 2003/06/05 Re: 270 transaction Laurance Stuntz
• 2003/06/05 RE: AHA! An Implementation Plan, or New, Improved Train Wreck? Martin Scholl
• 2003/06/05 RE: Transition paper Michael Christensen
• 2003/06/05 RE: 270 transaction Mike Urban
• 2003/06/05 RE: Transition paper Jensen, Martin
• 2003/06/05 RE: Transition paper Anthony Mercaldi
• 2003/06/05 270 transaction Adams, Billie Jo
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Herb Larsen
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Mazza, Ralph
• 2003/06/05 Re: Payors not compliant effective on provider TDefino
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider David Frenkel
• 2003/06/05 Re: Payors not compliant effective on provider Marcus E. McCrory
• 2003/06/05 RE: Transition paper Bill Chessman
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider John Sherman
• 2003/06/05 Newborn weight in 4010 - gone in 4010A1 - are people implementing this? Alec Tengler
• 2003/06/05 Re: Payors not compliant effective on provider marsha . solomon
• 2003/06/05 Re: Payors not compliant effective on provider William J. Kammerer
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Miriam Paramore
• 2003/06/05 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider John Sherman
• 2003/06/05 Payors not compliant effective on provider Brenda K. Burton
• 2003/06/04 Re: Paper Claims to Medicare? Doug Webb
• 2003/06/04 RE: Payors not compliant effective on provider Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/04 RE: Paper Claims to Medicare? Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/04 RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Bill Chessman
• 2003/06/04 RE: [BULK] - RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Bill Chessman
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper David Frenkel
• 2003/06/04 If anybody thought it was easy to get paid... David Frenkel
• 2003/06/04 RE: XML vs. EDI Ajay K Sanghi
• 2003/06/04 Re: Identifying Medicare as Corrected Priority Payer Robert C. Pozniak
• 2003/06/04 RE: Paper Claims to Medicare? Michelle Cadrin-Msumba
• 2003/06/04 Re: XML vs. EDI William J. Kammerer
• 2003/06/04 ETIN Del Texley
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper Upleger, Grace
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper Chris Brancato
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper Halpin, Leah
• 2003/06/04 XML vs. EDI Mazza, Ralph
• 2003/06/04 Re: Transition paper Christopher Feahr
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper David Frenkel
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper David Frenkel
• 2003/06/04 Re: Transition paper Doug Webb
• 2003/06/04 Identifying Medicare as Corrected Priority Payer Scott Benedict
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper Bill Chessman
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper Fox, Harry
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/04 RE: Transition paper David Frenkel
• 2003/06/04 RE: Cut off dates for TCS Kaye Laymance
• 2003/06/03 FW: [ebxml-mktg] Big news day for ebXML Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/03 RE: [BULK] - XML vs. EDI Kevin Day
• 2003/06/03 RE: XML vs. EDI Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/03 RE: Transition paper Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/03 RE: Transition paper Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/03 RE: Transition paper Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/03 RE: Transition paper Rachel Foerster
• 2003/06/03 Re: Transition paper Christopher Feahr
• 2003/06/03 RE: Cut off dates for TCS Tucci-Kaufhold, Ruth A.
• 2003/06/03 Re: Cut off dates for TCS Doug Webb
• 2003/06/03 RE: Cut off dates for TCS Kaye Laymance
• 2003/06/03 RE: Transition paper Miriam Paramore
• 2003/06/03 Re: Transition paper Christopher Feahr
• 2003/06/03 RE: Cut off dates for TCS Tucci-Kaufhold, Ruth A.
• 2003/06/03 RE: Cut off dates for TCS Linda McCardel
• 2003/06/03 Re: Transition paper Mimi Hart
• 2003/06/03 RE: Cut off dates for TCS Brandi Wyatt
• 2003/06/03 Re: Transition paper Christopher Feahr

• Earlier messages