|
Mike, Here is what I find in the 835: Notice 2.2.1.1 Service Line Balancing (capitalization is theirs, not mine)
2.2.1 Balancing The amounts reported in the 835, if present, MUST balance at three different levels - the service line, the claim, and the transaction. Adjustments within the 835, through use of the Claim Adjustment and Service Adjustment Segments, CAS, or Provider Adjustment Segments, PLB, DECREASE the payment when the adjustment amount is POSITIVE, and INCREASE the payment when the adjustment amount is NEGATIVE. See 2.2.4, Claim Adjustment and Service Adjustment Segment Theory, for more details. 2.2.1.1 Service Line Balancing Although the service payment information is optional, it is REQUIRED for all professional claims or anytime payment adjustments are related to specific line items from the original submitted claim. When used, the submitted service charge minus the sum of all monetary adjustments must equal the amount paid for this service line. Table 2 - Detail POS. # SEG. ID NAME USAGE REPEAT LOOP REPEAT
David G. Foulke Software Development Dairyland Healthcare Solutions 320-634-5331 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This information is confidential and is for the use of the intended recipient only. Any improper use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender immediately and delete this communication
-----Original Message-----
No. This note in the SVC is pretty clear: Although the SVC loop is optional, there are times when it should be considered mandatory. Whenever the actual payment has been reduced due to service line specific adjustments, the SVC loop is necessary in order to understand the remittance information. This situation is particularly applicable to professional and fee-based services.
Even if you consider "should be considered mandatory" to by synonymous with "required" (they are not), the SVC segment is only needed when adjustments reduce the amount paid.
The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time. You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org |
Title: Message
- COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
- Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
- RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
- RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
- RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
- RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
- RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
- RE: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
- RE: COB Balancing Rachel Foerster
