|
The issue, for me, is not reporting the
adjustments, it’s reporting the payments at the line level as we don’t track
that information today. The adjustments have always been tracked. ____________________ Jennifer Lynne
Jones Sanitas Product Manager Pinpoint Technologies Boulder,
CO 80301 303-801-1829 (Direct) 303-801-0001
(Fax) -----Original
Message----- No.
This note in the SVC is pretty clear: Although the SVC loop is optional, there are times when it should
be considered mandatory. Whenever the actual payment has been reduced due to
service line specific adjustments, the SVC loop is necessary in order to
understand the remittance information. This situation is particularly
applicable to professional and fee-based services. Even if
you consider "should be considered mandatory" to by synonymous with
"required" (they are not), the SVC segment is only needed when
adjustments reduce the amount paid. -----Original
Message----- Correct me if I'm incorrect, but 835's returning payment
information on professional claims are required to return service line
information are they not? Therefore there has to be SOME service line
information, even it's nothing more than one payment. Thanks Dave David
G. Foulke Software
Development Dairyland
Healthcare Solutions 320-634-5331 [EMAIL PROTECTED] This information is confidential and is for the use of the intended
recipient only. Any improper use of this information is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender immediately
and delete this communication -----Original Message----- Robert, Also,
how can the Clearinghouse possibly know what the EOB or 835 you received
contained? As
you pointed out, the 837 must accurately report what was received from the
primary payer. Requiring
service-line level adjustments when you do not have service-line level
information is just plain wrong. The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily the
opinion of LCMH. Douglas M. Webb "This electronic message may contain information that is
confidential and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the
individual(s) and entity(s) named as recipients in the message. If you
are not an intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender
immediately, delete the material from any computer, do not deliver,
distribute, or copy this message, and do not disclose its contents or take
action in reliance on the information it contains. Thank you."
----- Original Message -----
To: WEDI SNIP Transactions Workgroup List
Cc: WEDI SNIP Transactions Workgroup List
Sent:
Monday, September 22, 2003 07:16 AM Subject: Re: COB Balancing --- --- --- The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. These listservs should not be used for commercial marketing purposes or discussion of specific vendor products and services. They also are not intended to be used as a forum for personal disagreements or unprofessional communication at any time. You are currently subscribed to wedi-transactions as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this list, go to the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org or send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you need to unsubscribe but your current email address is not the same as the address subscribed to the list, please use the Subscribe/Unsubscribe form at http://subscribe.wedi.org |
Title: Message
- COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
- Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
- RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
- RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
- RE: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Jones, Jennifer
- Re: COB Balancing Doug Webb
- RE: COB Balancing Mike Urban
- RE: COB Balancing Dave Foulke
- RE: COB Balancing Robert C. Pozniak
- RE: COB Balancing Rachel Foerster
