On Sunday, January 7, 2018 at 9:14:04 AM UTC-8, mwall wrote: > > the MQTT/influx option is not as complicated as you might think. the > result is far more robust than most methods, and much easier to > manage/maintain. if you're aggregating data from a bunch of > sensors/stations, don't reinvent the wheel! using MQTT/influx lets you > focus on the value you provide with your servers/systems instead of mucking > around with "do i need a timestamp?" or "should i use GET or PUT or POST?" > or "how do i handle three different types of weather stations?" > > One of the benefits of aggregating 'into' a weewx instance is the ease of getting plots and reports 'out' of the aggregate db using weewx's skins magic.
For the MQTT/influxdb scenario-5 do you have a recommendation for how to generate nice-looking skins (so to speak) that would reasonably equivalent to weewx's ease of use ? Would that be jumping into grafana, or writing something with express ala weeRT's approach, or some other mechanism ? (thanks for the diagrams incidentally - helps lots !) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
