The only clue I have is that the problem is not due to an « overloading » of 
your raspberry pi, but seems to occur with specific dateTime values.
You can try to run your script only with a « bad » dateTime :

"SELECT dateTime, Radiation from archive where dateTime = 1592614500 »

Does the error occurs ? If yes, you can try to add debugging print commands 
inside the sunshineThreshold function to try to understand.



> Le 30 juin 2022 à 19:51, 'Peter Fletcher' via weewx-user 
> <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> It did as it seems you predicted - passed 1592614800 and stopped at 
> 1632611100. You obviously have a clue as to what is going on. Please explain!
> 
> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 8:59:48 AM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:
> If you exclude the first one,1592614500 , with a query like "SELECT dateTime, 
> Radiation from archive where dateTime <> 1592614500", will the script stop at 
> 1592614800 ( the next dateTime) or will it continue and stop at 1632611100 ?
> 
> 
>> Le 30 juin 2022 à 14:34, 'Peter Fletcher' via weewx-user 
>> <[email protected] 
>> <applewebdata://7E89D470-DC46-4264-8298-3BC6CF436506>> a écrit :
>> 
> 
>> 1592614500
>> 1632611100
>> 1632611400
>> 1647688800
>> 
>> I can't see a pattern or any common features.
>> 
>> On Thursday, June 30, 2022 at 3:55:49 AM UTC-4 [email protected] 
>> <http://gmail.com/> wrote:
>> No, I never had weewx  crashes related to the sunshine calculations. 
>> 
>> What are the dateTime values that trigger the error ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Le mercredi 29 juin 2022 à 23:23:16 UTC+2, Peter Fletcher a écrit :
>> Have you had any odd weewx errors or crashes related to the sunshine 
>> calculations? I ask because I hadn't, but I decided to try to 'backfill' my 
>> database with sunshine times, based on the 5-minute radiation values, and I 
>> ran into a bizarre bug. I used the code shown below (on a copy of my live 
>> weewx database). As you will see, the threshold calculation code is 
>> essentially identical to yours, except that it has been converted to a 
>> regular function (no 'self' parameter) and my station's latitude and 
>> longitude are hard coded in it. When the code is run under Python 3.9.2 on 
>> my Pi, it initially runs without problems, but crashes after 8,000+ records 
>> have been processed with a ValueError on the MaxThreshold vs threshold 
>> comparison, reporting that it can't compare a complex with a float! If I 
>> intercept and log the errors, it turns out that, for a few specific values 
>> of dateTime, the function returns a complex number! Even more bizarrely, it 
>> only seems to do that in the context of the running code. If I manually run 
>> through all the operations from the function code at the Python command 
>> line, using the value of dateTime that produces the first crash, all the 
>> intermediate results and the final result are sane floats.
>> There appears to be a second issue, possibly related to my reading and 
>> writing the database at relatively high frequency, which stalls the process 
>> after about 18,000 records have been processed, but removing the database 
>> writes allows it to run to completion without abolishing the consistent, 
>> albeit infrequent, ValueErrors.
>> 
>> [backfill.py]
>> import sqlite3
>> from datetime import datetime
>> import time
>> from math import sin, cos, pi, asin
>> 
>> def sunshineThreshold(mydatetime):
>>     coeff = 0.9  # change to calibrate with your sensor
>>     utcdate = datetime.utcfromtimestamp(mydatetime)
>>     dayofyear = int(time.strftime("%j", time.gmtime(mydatetime)))
>>     theta = 360 * dayofyear / 365
>>     equatemps = 0.0172 + 0.4281 * cos((pi / 180) * theta) - 7.3515 * sin(
>>         (pi / 180) * theta) - 3.3495 * cos(2 * (pi / 180) * theta) - 9.3619 
>> * sin(
>>         2 * (pi / 180) * theta)
>> 
>>     latitude = 43.0346213
>>     longitude = -78.689362
>> 
>>     corrtemps = longitude * 4
>>     declinaison = asin(0.006918 - 0.399912 * cos((pi / 180) * theta) + 
>> 0.070257 * sin(
>>         (pi / 180) * theta) - 0.006758 * cos(2 * (pi / 180) * theta) + 
>> 0.000908 * sin(
>>         2 * (pi / 180) * theta)) * (180 / pi)
>>     minutesjour = utcdate.hour * 60 + utcdate.minute
>>     tempsolaire = (minutesjour + corrtemps + equatemps) / 60
>>     angle_horaire = (tempsolaire - 12) * 15
>>     hauteur_soleil = asin(sin((pi / 180) * latitude) * sin((pi / 180) * 
>> declinaison) + cos(
>>         (pi / 180) * latitude) * cos((pi / 180) * declinaison) * cos((pi / 
>> 180) * angle_horaire)) * (180 / pi)
>>     seuil = (0.73 + 0.06 * cos((pi / 180) * 360 * dayofyear / 365)) * 1080 * 
>> pow(
>>         (sin(pi / 180) * hauteur_soleil), 1.25) * coeff
>>     return seuil
>> 
>> 
>> database = 'weewx.sdb'
>> 
>> maxThreshold=0
>> count=0
>> conn=sqlite3.connect(database)
>> cur=conn.execute("SELECT dateTime, Radiation from archive")
>> for row in cur:
>>     count += 1
>>     if (row[1] is not None) and (row[1] > 20):
>>     threshold = sunshineThreshold(row[0])
>>     if threshold > maxThreshold:
>>         maxThreshold = threshold
>>     if row[1] > threshold:
>>         conn.execute("UPDATE archive set SunshineTime = 5 WHERE dateTime = " 
>> + str(row[0]))
>>     if count % 1000 == 0:
>>         print(count, 'Max Threshold', maxThreshold)
>> conn.close
>> [/backfill.py]
>> 
>> On Friday, June 10, 2022 at 3:29:40 AM UTC-4 [email protected] <> wrote:
>> On my side, I have looked at the CPU utilization on my raspberry Pi 3B+. I 
>> have the mqtt  service service installed, so at each loop all data of the 
>> packet are sent to the mqtt broker.
>> 
>> With mqtt and when calculations of the sunshine threshold is done for each 
>> loop packet, the total CPU utilization of python3 is about 0.75%
>> With mqtt and without calculation of sunshine threshold : 0.5% of total CPU.
>> 
>> So one can estimate that 0.25 % of total CPU is needed for the calculation 
>> of the threshold value for each LOOP packet.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Le 9 juin 2022 à 22:26, 'Peter Fletcher' via weewx-user 
>>> <[email protected] <>> a écrit :
>>> 
>> 
>>> After some experimentation, I found that the radiation value in the VP2 
>>> LOOP packets does, indeed, normally change every 50-52 seconds, but, 
>>> perhaps about a fifth of the 'gaps' are a multiple of that time - most 
>>> often 100+ or 150+ seconds, but occasionally more than that (I saw one 250+ 
>>> second 'gap'). I saw this under conditions of variable sunshine and clouds 
>>> when it seemed unlikely that the actual radiation value would have been 
>>> precisely constant for that length of time, so I am not sure exactly what 
>>> is going on. In any event, I am revising the code I am using on the basis 
>>> of doing the threshold calculation when the radiation level changes, but at 
>>> least every minute, if it remains constant for more than the normal 50-52 
>>> seconds..
>>> 
>>> On Sunday, June 5, 2022 at 12:33:47 PM UTC-4 [email protected] 
>>> <http://gmail.com/> wrote:
>>> I think it is also OK to do an average for every 30 seconds.  It depends 
>>> also on the weather station used.
>>> For  instance, a Davis Vantage Pro 2 ISS transmits an updated  solar 
>>> radiation value every 50 to 60 seconds. So with this weather station, even 
>>> a 1 minute average would not be very different  since anyway the solar 
>>> radiation values of the LOOP packet are the same for at least 50 seconds.!
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Le 5 juin 2022 à 18:02, 'Peter Fletcher' via weewx-user 
>>>> <[email protected] <>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> I chose to average the LOOP radiation readings and only to do the 
>>>> threshold calculation and make the sun/no sun determination every 30 
>>>> seconds because I thought doing it on every LOOP might overload LOOP 
>>>> processing (I am running weewx on a Pi 3B, which is also doing a few other 
>>>> things which use the CPU). If this is an unnecessary concern, as it may 
>>>> very well be, your modified code is much cleaner than mine.
>>>> 
>>>> On Saturday, June 4, 2022 at 12:41:08 PM UTC-4 [email protected] 
>>>> <http://gmail.com/> wrote:
>>>> It is a very good idea to calculate the sunshine duration for each LOOP 
>>>> packet and sum these values to make the final archive sunshine duration.  
>>>> I have modified my script accordingly :  
>>>> https://github.com/Jterrettaz/sunduration 
>>>> <https://github.com/Jterrettaz/sunduration>.
>>>> The logic is the following :  for each received LOOP packet, the radiation 
>>>> is compared to a calculated threshold. If the radiation is above the 
>>>> threshold value, the sunshine time for the LOOP packet is equal to the 
>>>> time elapsed between the  previous loop packet and this packet (most of 
>>>> the time 2 seconds with a Vantage Davis Pro).
>>>> The final archive sunshine duration is the sum of all the LOOP value 
>>>> within the archive period.
>>>> Le vendredi 3 juin 2022 à 21:59:36 UTC+2, Peter Fletcher a écrit :
>>>> That makes some sense when you are getting data from an 'external' sensor, 
>>>> though there are (IMHO) simpler ways of doing it. weewx already has access 
>>>> to the LOOP radiation data from the VP2, so handling the processing and 
>>>> data storage within weewx makes more sense to me in this case.
>>>> 
>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 3:24:23 PM UTC-4 vince wrote:
>>>> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 11:17:00 AM UTC-7 Meteo Oberwallis wrote:
>>>>  if the interval of Weewx and the data logger is set to 10 minutes, I 
>>>> would have liked to read the value of the solar sensor every minute and 
>>>> then write it into a separate .sdb database as possible sunshine.
>>>> 
>>>> Personally I'd use an external program called via cron and posting a 
>>>> message to a MQTT topic.  Have weewx subscribe to that topic to get the 
>>>> data into your db.
>>>> 
>>>> This is how I used to get my DS18b20 temperature sensor data into weewx.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe>.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>>> [email protected] <>.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/0e631671-0a74-4963-9f1c-e5f81bc7c366n%40googlegroups.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/0e631671-0a74-4963-9f1c-e5f81bc7c366n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe 
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe>.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>> [email protected] <>.
>> 
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/f0ecc86f-a615-4a24-a43f-ee0d3963b8adn%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/f0ecc86f-a615-4a24-a43f-ee0d3963b8adn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "weewx-user" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe>.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> [email protected] 
>> <applewebdata://7E89D470-DC46-4264-8298-3BC6CF436506>.
> 
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/39cf6daa-80ca-4ffb-89d3-0f00b971481an%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/39cf6daa-80ca-4ffb-89d3-0f00b971481an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google 
> Groups "weewx-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/weewx-user/19ylVTRqbh4/unsubscribe>.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/c07ed2bb-1e3d-43e2-b08c-08a7a3aa92dbn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/c07ed2bb-1e3d-43e2-b08c-08a7a3aa92dbn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/5DFFA779-0C35-4EE5-B04A-1C824F06F3E8%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to