And Roth, not Van Halen.

On 4/21/07, Ellen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Wouldn't a band named after the last name of a member usually be the
>  namesake of the lead singer? That would probably be Lennon, not Starr.
>
>  --- In [email protected], Dennis Rogers
>  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > I would say Santana does count. Do you think if Eddie Van Halen put
>  out a solo album he would call it "Eddie"? Winger and Nelson are
>  great pulls, though are there any more examples of this? My point is
>  I agree with you. Not only is it lame, it is at least pleasingly
>  rare. Imagine if the Beatles had instead been called "Starr".
>  >
>  > Ray Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You have easily just lost
>
>  about 40 cool points.
>  >
>  > Minimum.
>  >
>  > In the entire history of rock, only one band named simply using a
>  > band member's last name has ever been cool - Van Halen.*
>  >
>  > Daughtry is on par with Nelson and Winger.
>  >
>  > * Santana doesn't count because Carlos uses that name both for his
>  > old band and his own solo stuff. Blondie is a nickname. The Ramones
>  > are all psuedonyms. The use of articles like "The" or words
>  > like "band" or "group" don't count.
>  >
>  > --- In [email protected], "Maureen" <mortiifera@>
>  > wrote:
>  > >
>  > > yeah - it's the american idol chris daughtry - he's in a band
>  > called
>  > > daughtry. yes, i became OBSESSED with him on idol... he's totally
>  > > hot hot hot and i think he's a great singer. he was in a band
>  > called
>  > > Absent Element before Idol - i really liked that music better than
>  > his
>  > > new solo stuff cuz it's harder - his album post idol (also called
>  > > Daughtry) is softer and more pop but i'm still obsessed with him.
>  > he
>  > > does all his own work - no covers... and he's playing on may 24th
>  > at
>  > > the 9:30...
>  > >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------
>  > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
>  > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
>  >
>
>
>
>  

Reply via email to