On Jan 29, 2008 10:44 PM, Vadim Lebedev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sure that we don't want to start a flame war, > I'm sure that in some aspects git is better than mercurial > The choice of mercuriual is based on follownig: > 1) At mbdsys we're using mostly Mercurial so it is easier for us > 2) I was one of early contributors to Mercurial so i know the internals > much better tha those of git > 3) I've good contacts in mercurial developper community so problem > solving will be easier
flame war != argumentation What does it bring to contributors? Why is it better to subversion? Do we need the functionnalities mercurial brings? Is it easy to use under Windows? (since from what I see the only few contributors/developpers that use OpenWengo are mostly under Windows...) Some people use already git ect... Change is good in general, but not every change. If you want mercurial because it is only better for YOU or because it is cool, fine. But then it is a dictature, not an open project :p (ok it has been like this for a while...) -- Tanguy Krotoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> +33 6 68 42 70 24 _______________________________________________ Wengophone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel
