On Sunday 14 November 2004 02:10, Cedric Duval wrote: > Hmm. Then I think we should state the definition of .0 releases. > > For me (and until now), it was a rather "stable" release, at least one > on which we concentrated exclusively on polishing and fixing. (like 0.8, > intended to be good enough to be presented on LSM).
If I remember correctly, some time ago we decided that our "stable" and "development" versions didn't have much sense. In fact, AFAIK, we don't have any server running the supposed stable version (0.8).
pgpGVkgqR1SZV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
