On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 01:33:50PM -0400, Laurent Birtz wrote: > With Xan's addition of cumulative and non-cumulative ADD and MUL modifiers, > the computations are even more complex. Therefore I strongly feel that > simplifying the above formula is necessary.
Was there any reason for these additions? I don't recall them being discussed, they were simply committed as yet another cool feature. If you take them back out, the formula reverts to Dave's rather simple formulation, and we are back in a situation that somewhat resembles KISS. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
