-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nils Kneuper wrote:

> Okay, I just had a talk to a member of the student representatives and
> we will need their support to get permissions for the conf. They in
> general were speaking in favor of the conf, but raised an argument: we
> should have soom real reason to do this in a university. One suggestion
> was taht we could have one or two talks and official discussions a day
> so that all students of the university can benefit of this conf. IMO it
> is a rather good idea to do something like this since it would probably
> not too hard to do a talk like this and maybe we can get some new ideas
> from students participating. Here are some suggestions of topics that
> came to my mind that could be used for a talk that might interest students:

Yeah, we should have expected that to happen. It's a good idea anyway,
both for us and the project itself (new contributors, maybe?), so I say
we should give it a try. :)


> * how to work and coordinate an international and decentralised projekt
> as big as Wesnoth

You?


> * problems with complete rewrites of whole parts of the system and how
> to get around these problems

Mordante? ;)


> * optimisations in structures and how they were found/implemented (an
> example for this: rustys talk at linuxconf.au about the changes in ai
> calculations)

Rusty!


> * problems when porting to special architectures and devices with
> limited resources (eg the gp2x or really slow comps)

Oh my! ME!!! ;-)

I can do it, sure. Even if the port doesn't get playable I can still
talk about obstacles which can't be passed in such endavours. :P


> A suggestion I got from the
> student representatives member was something like "official talks from
> 10 till 12am, "closed" discussions and implementation work afterwards".
> I think this is rather reasonable since when such a talk is given not
> everyone participating in the conf has to be at the talk.

This time should be convenient both for us and attendants from "outside".


> Another topic: for how many hours a day and in which timeframe do we
> need the rooms? If we only need the rooms in rahter "human" hours it
> will not be a big problem, but if we wanted to work lets say from 7am to
> 10pm we would need a key to the rooms which will be more problematic. My
> first guess on times we would probaly do some real work was something
> like from 10am till 6pm. What do you think? Normal everyday talk can be
> done afterwards in some pubs, real work can be done in these hours.

I think that 10am-6pm is perfectly fine. We should leave ourselves some
time in the morning to sleep after hard work (:P) we do in the evening.


- --
pozdrawiam
Karol 'grzywacz' Nowak
- -> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- -> WWW: http://jabba.pl/grzywacz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF8a4NRUieRYbGU9ARAsCRAKC5lYBpCpzeCadm8XAM9VUfZ2ZN/QCfRaJW
W5PtVlCRTkJIMmA25QSZ0lI=
=Lez9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Reply via email to