No new feature expected on my side I wanted to migrate all animations to the future syntax for 1.4 but this is taking more time than expected
I also wanted to have "fire and forget" animations in, but that probably won't happen (I might still make it, but please don't wait for it...) On Dec 14, 2007 12:46 AM, Eric S. Raymond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nils Kneuper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I just wanted to remind you that I did plan to start a feature > > freeze in the next time. So what is this mail about? I wanted to ask > > you how much time anyone of you still needs with the features you > > plan for 1.4. If I get no responses at all to this mail, I will > > start the freeze between christmas and new years eve. So if you got > > something on your shedule, better answer the mail and list some > > stuff and how much time you need until features and strings can be > > frozen. > > I have no new code features planned. > > I am, of course, developing a campaign that I have been aiming for > 1.4. I expect "The Hammer of Thursagan", will freeze translatable > strings within a week or ten days or so. Taurus has generated a map for > the last unfinished scenario and is finishing the WML now. > > Feedback from other devs and in the forums on THoT has been pretty > positive -- everybody seems to like the dialogue and the new > loremaster unit line. The worst criticism I've gotten is that the > scenarios are "bland" (too easy and without enough variability in > tactical objectives), which I think is something that can be addressed > with map and balancing tweaks not affecting the translation. > > (Frankly I think most of this is simply the reaction of advanced-level > players to a campaign that is intended to be intermediate-level; I > have to fight a tendency in *myself* to make the scenarios too hard. > But I will address it.) > > Given the generally positive reaction, my plan is to check THoT into > mainline around Christmas. The art for it is kind of lacking but > SpaceInvader and Jetryl are working on that. > > All devs please take note: if you have objections to this plan, and in > particular if you think THoT is somehow fundamentally unworthy of > mainline, now is the time to air them. I promise to listen attentively. > -- > <a > href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/<http://www.catb.org/%7Eesr/>">Eric > S. Raymond</a> > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev >
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
