On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 09:54:49PM +0100, Nils Kneuper wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mark de Wever schrieb: > > I've no more features to add (at least not for 1.4 ;-)), so I slowly > > start to get into debug mode. Still hope to get mp campaigns workable > > before 1.4. > > Will you need new strings for this, you know, interface stuff and such?
It used to work, so it should only be bugfixing and I don't expect new strings. > > I haven't played with the new campaigns, but do we want to ship them > > all in 1.4? If not we should tell the translators not to focus on the > > stuff we want to remove. > > I think so far we said that all currently included campaigns should be shipped > in 1.4. That is at least what was the result of some short discussion in > #wesnoth-dev and what I already mailed the translators about two months ago > (cf. > https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-i18n/2007-10/msg00013.html ). I think all To quote a part of that mail: "Probably all of the current campaigns in trunk will be in 1.4.x." so would be nice to do a final judgement now. Especially The Hammer of Thursagan since it's quite new, is it mainline quality? I haven't played it and probably won't any time soon. (My Wesnoth playing time has been greatly reduced since I started to code.) > What is the status of UtbS, will it be all right for 1.4 or do we have some > major problems with it. Is someone currently maintaining it or is it just > "prey > that it works as expected"? UtbS also concerns me, I still hope it can be fixed before 1.4. Regards, Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
