On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 21:54 +0100, allefant wrote:
> Yes, any possible future AI or scripting additions should be discussed > on the forum of course. Just was trying to clarify why I think the > PythonAI failed - just generally blaming "Python" would be a bit > simple-minded and not help prevent similar problems in the future. > Ivanovic mentioned work on Lua scripting in the initial post of the > thread - so my impression was this already is or will soon be > available in SVN, I wouldn't really have suggested it otherwise :) I take it a python solution without a sandbox will never be an option even if downloading of python scripts is excluded? Any particular reason to completely exclude the development of python AIs regardless of sandbox status? -- Greg Copeland <gtcopel...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list Wesnoth-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
