On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 15:57:28 -0500, George B <[email protected]> wrote: > > I agree with the list of parameters, including backstab. A few others > possibilities, if the system is going to be developed with a lock/unlock > mechanic: giving units, gold and villages? That would make negotiations > interesting perhaps. Player A might agree to swap maps, but only if Player > B gives them control of a village, or X gold. I'm not sure if these are > good options for most games, but surely they would be interested in > some circumstances, and could be locked out normally.
It could be harder to win when you have alliances. Dune (the boardgame) used to have some optional rules for doing this. The PBEM game Phoenix (written by Don Woods) had some interesting ideas for alliances. They were hidden while alliances were small. Once formally allied, everyone in the alliance had to agree to disband the alliance. Some info on the game is available from: http://www.icynic.com/~don/phoenix/intro.html _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
