After reading the developer agreement, I would like to point out the fact
that Apple does not seem to be the distributor of the app store apps. They
merely act as an agent for the developer, i.e. Kyle. Also, it appears that
Kyle is in violation of both the GPL and the Iphone Developer Agreement as
gabba noted. I completely support his violation of the Developer Agreement
as I think its terms are absolutely ridiculous.

I tend to agree with gabba that we should not support Apple's draconian
system by allowing Wesnoth to be distributed in the app store. However, I
also recognize the fact that a lot of Wesnoth contributors support such
distribution. The licenses that I suggested before (CDDL and MPL) would
allow for violation-free distribution in the app store. That is, such
distribution could be done that didn't violate the license and also didn't
violate the Iphone Developer Agreement. This is because, for the most part,
the dev agreement restricts the licensing of the binary and not the source
code, and the licenses do the opposite. Unlike BSD-like licenses the source
code would be required to stay open and freely licensed.

-Chris Hopman

Also, all wesnoth dependencies are distributed under a license compatible
with either CDDL or MPL.
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev

Reply via email to