David White wrote: > I agree that to resolve the situation, we need to make it clear that to > allow the iPhone/app store port to be unarguably uninfringing on > anyone's rights, that a licensing exception has to be agreed to by any > developer who has contributed a substantial amount of C++ code [1] to > Wesnoth. Any developer who objects to the licensing exception will have > to have their code removed from Wesnoth, or at least from the iPhone > port of Wesnoth (with steps taken to ensure it's not re-added in any > future merges). [...] > [1] It is my belief that the other content we have in Wesnoth -- art, > music, WML, is not problematic. If anyone thinks it is they are welcome > to discuss that, of course.
Since the problem is not related to the availability of sourcecode, but to the "you may only use the program according to our usage guidelines" legalese (= only on five devices, etc.), I think it applies to every GPLed content, including WML, art, music. But it seems that the art contributors - at least following Jetrel - are more relaxed about this, so it may not be a big problem to get their consent. Paul _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
